jsinq Issue Tracker Rss Feed

jsinq Issue Tracker Rss Feedhttp://www.codeplex.com/jsinq/WorkItem/List.aspxjsinq Issue Tracker Rss DescriptionClosed Issue: EqualityComparer error [5326]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/workitem/5326I tryed to use distinct with equalityComparer without any luck.<br />When I saw the jsinq.js, I found an error on line 105, in the "EqualityComparer.fromFunction".<br />For some reason, the code is "comparer.compare = func;" where I think it must be "comparer.equals = func;"<br />With this change, the comparer do work.<br />Comments: <p>Solved.</p>kaijaegerWed, 04 Aug 2010 06:39:54 GMTClosed Issue: EqualityComparer error [5326] 20100804063954ACommented Issue: EqualityComparer error [5326]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/workitem/5326I tryed to use distinct with equalityComparer without any luck.<br />When I saw the jsinq.js, I found an error on line 105, in the "EqualityComparer.fromFunction".<br />For some reason, the code is "comparer.compare = func;" where I think it must be "comparer.equals = func;"<br />With this change, the comparer do work.<br />Comments: ** Comment from web user: kaijaeger ** <p>Thank you for reporting this! This has been resolved in JSINQ 1.0.0.2.</p>kaijaegerWed, 04 Aug 2010 06:39:19 GMTCommented Issue: EqualityComparer error [5326] 20100804063919ACreated Issue: EqualityComparer error [5326]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/workitem/5326I tryed to use distinct with equalityComparer without any luck.<br />When I saw the jsinq.js, I found an error on line 105, in the "EqualityComparer.fromFunction".<br />For some reason, the code is "comparer.compare = func;" where I think it must be "comparer.equals = func;"<br />With this change, the comparer do work.<br />ndaz5Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:37:58 GMTCreated Issue: EqualityComparer error [5326] 20100803033758PClosed Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2936There is a bug in the aggregate function in jsinq-enumerable.js . If you pass to the function a seed argument the function shouldn't throw with an empty array. It should return the seed.<br /><br />My proposed fix:<br />aggregate: function() {<br />	var enumerator = this.getEnumerator();<br /><br />	var running;<br />	var func;<br />	var resultSelector = identity;<br />	if (arguments.length >= 2) {<br />		running = arguments[0];<br />		func = arguments[1];<br />		if (arguments.length >= 3) {<br />			resultSelector = arguments[2];<br />		}<br />	} else {<br />		if (!enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />			throw new InvalidOperationException();<br />		}						<br /><br />		func = arguments[0];		<br />		running = enumerator.current();<br />	}<br />	while (enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />		running = func(running, enumerator.current());<br />	} <br />	return resultSelector(running);<br />},<br />Comments: <p>Fixed in 1.0</p>kaijaegerSat, 27 Mar 2010 14:35:58 GMTClosed Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936] 20100327023558PCommented Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2936There is a bug in the aggregate function in jsinq-enumerable.js . If you pass to the function a seed argument the function shouldn't throw with an empty array. It should return the seed.<br /><br />My proposed fix:<br />aggregate: function() {<br />	var enumerator = this.getEnumerator();<br /><br />	var running;<br />	var func;<br />	var resultSelector = identity;<br />	if (arguments.length >= 2) {<br />		running = arguments[0];<br />		func = arguments[1];<br />		if (arguments.length >= 3) {<br />			resultSelector = arguments[2];<br />		}<br />	} else {<br />		if (!enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />			throw new InvalidOperationException();<br />		}						<br /><br />		func = arguments[0];		<br />		running = enumerator.current();<br />	}<br />	while (enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />		running = func(running, enumerator.current());<br />	} <br />	return resultSelector(running);<br />},<br />Comments: ** Comment from web user: kaijaeger ** <p>Oh, and thanks a lot for reporting/suggesting a fix! Much appreciated!</p>kaijaegerSat, 27 Mar 2010 14:35:41 GMTCommented Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936] 20100327023541PCommented Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2936There is a bug in the aggregate function in jsinq-enumerable.js . If you pass to the function a seed argument the function shouldn't throw with an empty array. It should return the seed.<br /><br />My proposed fix:<br />aggregate: function() {<br />	var enumerator = this.getEnumerator();<br /><br />	var running;<br />	var func;<br />	var resultSelector = identity;<br />	if (arguments.length >= 2) {<br />		running = arguments[0];<br />		func = arguments[1];<br />		if (arguments.length >= 3) {<br />			resultSelector = arguments[2];<br />		}<br />	} else {<br />		if (!enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />			throw new InvalidOperationException();<br />		}						<br /><br />		func = arguments[0];		<br />		running = enumerator.current();<br />	}<br />	while (enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />		running = func(running, enumerator.current());<br />	} <br />	return resultSelector(running);<br />},<br />Comments: ** Comment from web user: kaijaeger ** <p>Somehow this totally slipped past me. Mea culpa! It is fixed in the 1.0 release.</p>kaijaegerSat, 27 Mar 2010 14:35:20 GMTCommented Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936] 20100327023520PCreated Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936]http://jsinq.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2936There is a bug in the aggregate function in jsinq-enumerable.js . If you pass to the function a seed argument the function shouldn't throw with an empty array. It should return the seed.<br /><br />My proposed fix:<br />aggregate: function() {<br />	var enumerator = this.getEnumerator();<br /><br />	var running;<br />	var func;<br />	var resultSelector = identity;<br />	if (arguments.length >= 2) {<br />		running = arguments[0];<br />		func = arguments[1];<br />		if (arguments.length >= 3) {<br />			resultSelector = arguments[2];<br />		}<br />	} else {<br />		if (!enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />			throw new InvalidOperationException();<br />		}						<br /><br />		func = arguments[0];		<br />		running = enumerator.current();<br />	}<br />	while (enumerator.moveNext()) {<br />		running = func(running, enumerator.current());<br />	} <br />	return resultSelector(running);<br />},<br />xanatosWed, 07 Oct 2009 07:38:16 GMTCreated Issue: Bug in aggregate function if array is empty [2936] 20091007073816A